4.5 Article

Social capital and HIV-serodiscordance: Disparities in access to personal and professional resources for HIV-positive and HIV-negative partners

期刊

SSM-POPULATION HEALTH
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101056

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [MOP-137009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated how serodiscordant couples access social resources for health. The findings showed that partners with HIV have greater access to formal resources, while both partners have similar access to resources through informal social relationships. Moreover, HIV positive partners accessed a greater variety of support through formal ties.
As people living with HIV are living longer lives, they have a correspondingly greater opportunity to enjoy long-term romantic and sexual partnerships, including with persons who do not live with HIV ( serodiscordant relationships). In these dyads, asymmetries may emerge in access to social resources between partners. In this paper we examined how serodiscordant couples access informal (interpersonal, such as family and friends) and formal (practitioner, such as doctor or social worker) social resources for health. We recruited 540 participants in current serodiscordant relationships, working with 150 AIDS service organizations and HIV clinics across Canada from 2016 to 2018. Our findings demonstrate that partners with HIV have greater access to formal resources than their partners (through health care professionals, therapists/counselors/support workers), while both persons have similar access to resources through informal social relationships (family and friends). Furthermore, the findings indicated that HIV positive partners accessed more varied forms of support through formal ties, compared to HIV negative persons. We offer recommendations for changes to how HIV-negative partners in a serodiscordant relationship are served and cared for, and particularly, the importance of moving toward dyad-focused policies and practices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据