4.5 Article

Do environmental technologies help to reduce transport sector CO2 emissions? Evidence from the EU15 countries

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2021.101047

关键词

Transport sector; CO2 emissions; Environmental technologies; EU15

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the impact of technological progress on carbon emissions in the transport sector and finds that environmental technologies have no significant positive effect on CO2 emissions. Additionally, economic growth and energy consumption lead to more pollution while urbanization does not have a statistically significant impact on emissions. Policymakers in EU15 countries are recommended to pay special attention to the transport sector in order to achieve a carbon-neutral economy.
A growing number of studies empirically investigate the nexus between CO2 emissions and technological progress in the existing literature. However, these studies largely ignore sectoral-level differences. We argue that as the contribution of different sectors to carbon emissions are not equal, the environmental impact of technological progress might vary across sectors. The main purpose of this paper is to fill this research gap for the transport sector. To this end, we specifically focus on the EU15 countries over the period between 1977 and 2015. In order to empirically analyze this link, we use the Mean Group, Common Correlated Effects Mean Group, and the Augmented Mean Group estimators. Unlike the earlier country-level empirical studies, our findings reveal that environmental technologies have a statistically insignificant positive effect on CO2 emissions from the transport sector. Moreover, while economic growth and energy consumption lead to more pollution, the effect of urbanization on emissions is not statistically significant. It is recommended that the policymakers of EU15 countries should pay special attention to the transport sector for becoming a carbon-neutral economy by 2050.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据