4.7 Article

Lattice model of oligonucleotide hybridization in solution. II. Specificity and cooperativity

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 144, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4943577

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CTS-0327487]
  2. Welch Foundation
  3. Rice Terascale Cluster - NSF [EIA-0216467]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Because oligonucleotides are short sequences of nucleic acid bases, their association in solution with complementary strands (hybridization) is often seen to conform to a simple two-state model. However, experimental evidence suggests that, despite their short length, oligonucleotides may hybridize through multiple states involving intermediates. We investigate whether these apparently contradictory scenarios are possible by imposing different levels of sequence specificity on a lattice model of oligonucleotides in solution, which we introduced in Part I [J. C. Araque et al., J. Chem. Phys. 134, 165103 (2011)]. We find that both multiple-intermediate (weakly cooperative) and two-state (strongly cooperative) transitions are possible and that these are directly linked to the level of sequence specificity. Sequences with low specificity hybridize (base-by-base) by way of multiple stable intermediates with increasing number of paired bases. Such intermediate states are weakly cooperative because the energetic gain from adding an additional base pair is outweighed by the conformational entropy loss. Instead, sequences with high specificity hybridize through multiple metastable intermediates which easily bridge the configurational and energetic gaps between single- and double-stranded states. These metastable intermediates interconvert with minimal loss of conformational entropy leading to a strongly cooperative hybridization. The possibility of both scenarios, multiple-and two-states, is therefore encoded in the specificity of the sequence which in turn defines the level of cooperativity. (C) 2016 AIP Publishing LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据