Serving quarreling masters: Frontline workers and policy implementation under pressure

How do frontline workers implement policy when it is politically contested and they face strong pressure from politicians and the media? Based on original data and a multi-method analysis of juvenile justice policy and child protection policy in Switzerland, we show that political conflict can change policy implementation when frontline workers adapt their implementation practices in response to political and media pressure. We demonstrate that frontline workers seek to limit the influence of political pressure on policy implementation to safeguard their professional autonomy and reputation. However, we observe that they may also occasionally engage in what we call blame-avoiding policy implementation. While formally complying with the policy mandate, frontline workers exploit their street-level discretion to make policy implementation less scandal-prone and blameworthy, thereby lowering the likelihood of blame attacks. The findings have important implications for our understanding of policy implementation and the functioning of bureaucracy in more conflictual times.

Automated summary

This study examines the impact of political conflict on frontline workers and their policy implementation practices. Through a case study in Switzerland, the researchers found that frontline workers adapt their practices to protect their professional autonomy and reputation, and to limit the influence of political pressure on policy implementation. They also occasionally engage in blame-avoiding policy implementation to reduce the likelihood of blame attacks.