4.4 Article

Exploring the frontiers in reality-enhanced service communication: from augmented and virtual reality to neuro-enhanced reality

期刊

JOURNAL OF SERVICE MANAGEMENT
卷 33, 期 4/5, 页码 657-674

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/JOSM-11-2021-0439

关键词

Service communication; Augmented reality; Virtual reality; Neuro-enhanced reality; Neuromarketing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The authors explore neuro-enhanced reality (NeR) as a novel approach for enhancing service communication and propose a research agenda based on the combination of neuroscientific research and augmented reality and virtual reality.
Purpose The authors explore neuro-enhanced reality (NeR) as a novel approach for enhancing service communication between customers, frontline employees, and service organizations that extends beyond current state-of-the-art approaches based on augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) technologies. Design/methodology/approach The authors first take stock of research on reality-enhanced service communication with AR and VR, then complement these insights with emerging neuroscientific research to conceptualize how NeR enables innovative forms of service communication. On this basis, the authors develop a research agenda to guide the future study and managerial exploitation of NeR. Findings AR and VR already offer unique affordances for digital-to-physical communication, but these can be extended with NeR. Specifically, NeR supports neuro-to-digital and digital-to-neuro communication based on neuroimaging (e.g. controlling digital content through thought) and neurostimulation (e.g. eliciting brain responses based on digital content). This provides a basis for outlining possible applications of NeR across service settings. Originality/value The authors advance knowledge on reality-enhanced service communication with AR and VR, whilst also demonstrating how neuroscientific research can be extended from understanding brain activity to generating novel service interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据