4.5 Article

Linking science and practice in participatory future-oriented assessment and planning of human heat stress vulnerability in Bonn, Germany

期刊

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2022.2043260

关键词

parallel modeling approach; human heat stress; scenario planning; vulnerability analysis; urban planning; Bonn; Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The juxtaposition of climate change and development changes is crucial for understanding the future impacts of heat stress in urban areas. This study applies a future-oriented vulnerability scenarios approach to analyze human heat stress in Bonn, Germany in 2035. The findings highlight the interplays between climate trajectories, heat exposure, and urban development scenario corridors, and demonstrate the potential for changing combinations of socio-economic vulnerability indicators.
The juxtaposition of climate change and development changes is vital for understanding the future impacts of heat stress in urban areas. However, an approach that considers the relationship between climatic factors and socio-economic vulnerability in a forward-looking and stakeholder-involved manner is challenging. This article demonstrates the application of a future-oriented vulnerability scenarios approach to address human heat stress in Bonn, Germany, in 2035. The study highlights the interplays between climate trajectories and heat exposure associated with urban development scenario corridors. Moreover, this method allows for changing combinations of intersections and conditionalities of projected individual socio-economic vulnerability indicators in response to social and climate governance. However, this study found that a conventional structure within city departments might limit this integrative approach in practice. Thus, the theoretical background and the concept of alternative futures and uncertainties should be the focus of communication with practitioners to maximize the utilization of the results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据