4.7 Article

Does economic policy uncertainty drive nonlinear risk spillover in the commodity futures market?

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102084

关键词

Economic policy uncertainty; Commodity futures market; Nonlinear tail risk spillover; Rolling tail-event driven network; Quantile-on-quantile approach

资金

  1. National Social Science Foundation of China [19BTJ024]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71671062]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes the rolling tail-event driven network technique to measure the dynamic nonlinear tail risk spillover of US commodity futures and investigates the effect of economic policy uncertainty on risk spillover. The findings show that the risk spillover effect increases when economic policy uncertainty is high, and the market is tightly connected. Crude oil, silver, and corn require more attention as they are the major risk transmitters. Moreover, the impact of economic policy uncertainty on risk spillover in the commodity futures market is asymmetric and heterogeneous, with grain and soft crops being more sensitive.
We propose the rolling tail-event driven network technique (RTENET) to measure the dynamic nonlinear tail risk spillover of 20 US commodity futures. In addition, we investigate the effect of economic policy uncertainty (EPU) on risk spillover based on quantile-on-quantile regression (QQR). We find that the risk spillover effect increases sharply and that the market is tightly connected when EPU is at a high level. Crude oil, silver and corn, the three greatest risk transmitters in the system, need more attention. More importantly, the effect of EPU on the risk spillover of the commodity futures market is asymmetric and heterogeneous. When the risk spillover falls within extremely high quantiles, a significant positive effect of EPU is observed. In addition, grain and soft crops are more sensitive to EPU. Our findings provide a reference for policy-makers and investors to manage commodity futures markets in different uncertainty periods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据