4.3 Article

The Psychology of Personalization in Digital Environments: From Motivation to Well-Being - A Theoretical Integration

期刊

REVIEW OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 26-40

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/10892680221105663

关键词

personalization; artificial intelligence; recommender systems; self-determination; motivation; needs; well-being

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes a psychological model that examines the effects of personalization in digital environments. It connects personalization with motivational tendencies, psychological needs, and well-being. Based on the model, the authors review studies from various domains to explain the positive and negative effects of personalization on individuals. While personalization can have desirable outcomes such as reducing choice overload, lack of transparency and user involvement in the personalization process can potentially threaten human well-being. Design recommendations and future research directions are discussed.
The personalization of digital environments is becoming ubiquitous due to the rise of AI-based algorithms and recommender systems. Arguably, this technological development has far-reaching consequences for individuals and societies alike. In this article, we propose a psychological model of the effects of personalization in digital environments, which connects personalization with motivational tendencies, psychological needs, and well-being. Based on the model, we review studies from three areas of application-news feeds and websites, music streaming, and online dating-to explain both the positive and the negative effects of personalization on individuals. We conclude that personalization can lead to desirable outcomes such as reducing choice overload. However, personalized digital environments without transparency and without the option for users to play an active role in the personalization process potentially pose a danger to human well-being. Design recommendations as well as avenues for future research that follow from these conclusions are being discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据