Approach of an Academic Ophthalmology Department to Recovery During the Coronavirus Pandemic

Introduction: A methodology for safe recovery of an ophthalmology department during a pandemic does not currently exist. This study describes successful recovery strategies for an urban, multi-specialty ophthalmology department serving a high-risk patient population. Methods: The study took place at a large multi-specialty tertiary care academic ophthalmology department in a metropolitan city during a seven-month period (March-October 2020). Five recovery ad hoc committees were charged with formulating metrics and initiatives to manage clinical volumes while maintaining safe practices, providing patient access, and minimizing financial damage. A six-tier system was created to resume non-urgent appointments in May 2020. Educational and research activities were maintained through the development of virtual curricula and research platforms. Results: The number of clinical and surgical visits per month in 2020 compared to 2019 and the time to reach >= 95% of pre-COVID patient volumes were monitored. In October 2020, >= 95% of pre-COVID volumes were attained (11,975 vs 12,337 patient visits in October 2019; 266 vs 272 surgical cases in October 2019). Despite significant financial losses, the department surpassed December 2019 collections in December 2020. No faculty, staff, or trainees received furloughs or pay cuts. There was no COVID-19 transmission between faculty, staff, and patients. Discussion: With strategic implementation of recovery strategies following CDC safety measures, it was possible to safely deliver care to patients with urgent and non-urgent eye conditions. Patient volumes were fully recovered in an ambulatory urban healthcare setting within a high-risk COVID-19 population within seven months while educational and research missions were successfully sustained.

Automated summary

This study describes successful recovery strategies for an urban, multi-specialty ophthalmology department serving a high-risk patient population. With strategic implementation of recovery strategies following CDC safety measures, it was possible to safely deliver care to patients with urgent and non-urgent eye conditions while educational and research missions were successfully sustained.