4.3 Article

Validation of the Affect Integration Inventory in a sample of patients with personality disorders: A cross-sectional study

期刊

ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA
卷 225, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103554

关键词

Affect integration; Affect Integration Inventory; Affect consciousness; Personality disorder; Emotional dysfunction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the Affect Integration Inventory in patients with personality disorders. The results showed that the questionnaire had satisfactory internal consistency, consistent factor structure, and reliable convergent and discriminant validity.
Affect integration is defined as the capacity to comprehend emotional experiences as meaningful and to convert this knowledge into well-adjusted motivation, communication and behavior. Thus, affect integration is considered essential for personal adjustment and well-being, and it has been operationalized through the Affect Integration Inventory. However, the validity of this questionnaire has been examined only in non-clinical respondents. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the questionnaire in a sample of patients with personality disorders (n = 87). The internal structure and consistency were addressed using Cronbach's alpha and confirmatory factor analysis. To determine aspects of convergent and discriminant validity, the correlations between the scores on the questionnaire and the scores on content-related questionnaires and scales were examined. Finally, scores from the clinical respondents and existing data from a previously collected non-clinical sample (n = 157) were compared to evaluate the external validity. The overall results demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency, a consistent factor structure, and systematic patterns of convergent and discriminant validity. Additionally, the findings indicated that the instrument clearly differentiated the clinical sample from the non-clinical sample.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据