4.7 Review

Toward sustainable public housing: A comparison of social aspects in public housing in the United State and Libya

期刊

HABITAT INTERNATIONAL
卷 122, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102513

关键词

Public housing programs; USA public housing; Libyan public housing; Sustainable community; Sustainable public housing; Social aspects

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the social problems in public housing programs in the USA and Libya and evaluates the attempts made to address these issues. The study shows that both countries can learn from each other and improve the quality of public housing.
A house is the center of socioeconomic activities for the resident family. More than that, it is part of the physical layout of the community, reflects the society's culture, and significantly affects the residents' behavior. Public housing (PH) programs or low-income and affordable housing are a large portion of the housing in developed and less developed countries. Thus, sustainable public housing (SPH) will promote the quality of life in those societies. This paper discusses the current situation of the PH programs in the USA and Libya from a sustainable perspective, focusing on the social aspect. Some social problems in PH programs in the USA are related to discrimination and isolation. In comparison, social problems in the Libyan PH programs appear to be related to a lack of cultural sensitivity while designing the residences. The study presented here evaluates the attempts that have been applied to provide potential solutions to these social problems based on comparing the two countries' PH situations. The study highlighted how both countries could benefit from each other's PH programs. It provides recommendations that decision-makers can use to improve the PH situations. It also provides application processes based on the traditional Libyan housing (TLH) and neighborhood features in both countries that could help improve the PH social environment for current and future projects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据