4.6 Article

Governance in transition: an analytical framework for hybridity and dynamics in higher education

期刊

HIGHER EDUCATION
卷 85, 期 2, 页码 379-397

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-022-00839-3

关键词

Higher education governance; University governance; Hybrid governance; Governance studies; Institutionalism; Public policy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to contribute conceptually to the understanding of higher education dynamics in the context of globalization by focusing on transitions in governance and variations at the local level. By constructing a hybrid analytical framework, the study examines the limitations and implications of various theoretical approaches to describing the transformation of governance in the education sector. The results provide a nuanced understanding of educational transition and offer insights for further research.
The rich body of literature that has sought to shed light on how global trends shape public sector institutions at the local level frequently claims that globalization is significantly transforming national institutions. Against that backdrop, the term governance is actually a multifaceted concept representing an ongoing process characterized by complex interactions between globally spreading movements and locally inherited interests. Focusing on transitions in governance and on the variations found in governance at the local level, the present study aims to make a conceptual contribution to existing characterizations of the dynamics of higher education in the context of globalization. After reviewing studies on changes in the governance of higher education, this paper identifies the limitations and implications of various theoretical approaches to describing the transformation of governance in the education sector. We then construct a hybrid analytical framework combining the main elements of institutional analysis (i.e., rational choice, sociological and historical institutionalism) with theories of public policy as a novel way of conceptualizing and operationalizing educational governance. While some scholars might be hesitant to embrace such an approach, we would argue that it deserves consideration. The framework provides an explicit conceptual construct for advancing the theoretical understanding of the concept of hybridization, which is of great utility for identifying the nuances of higher education governance in transition. Moreover, the analytical framework presented herein contributes to a more find-grained understanding of educational transition and extends previous empirical studies on dynamics in the higher education sector. The results can not only supplement the current approach to studying HE governance but also outline a possible trajectory for further research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据