4.5 Article

A partial evaluation approach for the School Bus Routing Problem

期刊

HELIYON
卷 8, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09291

关键词

Metaheuristics; Optimization; Partial evaluation; SBRP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study applies the partial evaluation approach to the School Bus Routing Problem (SBRP) in order to reduce its execution time. By analyzing the changed routes, unnecessary re-evaluation can be avoided, leading to a significant reduction in execution time. The results demonstrate that execution time can be decreased in 80% of instances, with an average reduction of 73.6%.
Several real-life optimization problems, such as the case of several instances of the School Bus Routing Problem (SBRP), are very complex and expensive to solve with exact algorithms. Metaheuristics are a good alternative in these situations because they are capable of generating good quality solutions to these problems in a reasonable time. Metaheuristics iterate thousands of times by introducing changes concerning the previous solutions. Each new solution must be evaluated, and sometimes, the new solutions have elements unchanged that are unnecessarily re-evaluated. However, an approach avoids repeatedly evaluating parts of different solutions known as partial evaluation. This work applies this technique to the SBRP to reduce its execution time. To apply the partial evaluation approach in this problem, each solution contains the information of the change that was made concerning the solution from which it originates. With this information, when evaluating the objective function, it will be only necessary to analyze the routes that changed. In the literature reviewed, no previous work was found in which the partial evaluation approach has been applied in the context of SBRP. In this paper we apply it in order to reduce the computational cost of SBRP solutions based on metaheuristics. The results show that it is possible to decrease the execution time in 80% of the instances, reducing the execution time on average by 73.6%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据