4.5 Article

Doing research is not beyond my reach: The reconstruction of College English teachers' professional identities through a domestic visiting program

期刊

TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2022.103648

关键词

College English teachers; Professional identity; Professional development; Visiting study program; China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the trajectories of Chinese College English teachers' identity reconstruction throughout a domestic visiting study program. Three teachers in a one-year program were followed and data were collected through interview and observation. The study found that a research dimension was either activated or reinforced in their professional identities. Three distinctive trajectories of development were identified: from 'unreconciled dreamer' to 'fulfilled research practitioner', from 'passive adapter' to 'agentic researcher-teacher', and from 'invisible layperson' to 'confident teacher-researcher'. The reconstruction of their professional identities is explained in relation to the interplay between personal factors and the mediating context reified by the program.
This study explores the trajectories of Chinese College English teachers' identity reconstruction throughout a domestic visiting study program. Three teachers in a one-year program were followed and data were collected through interview and observation. Analysis shows that a research dimension was either activated or reinforced in their professional identities. Three distinctive trajectories of development were identified: from 'unreconciled dreamer' to 'fulfilled research practitioner', from 'passive adapter' to 'agentic researcher-teacher', and from 'invisible layperson' to 'confident teacher-researcher'. The reconstruction of their professional identities is explained in relation to the interplay between personal factors and the mediating context reified by the program. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据