4.6 Article

Functional assessment of cerebral artery stenosis: A pilot study based on computational fluid dynamics

期刊

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
卷 37, 期 7, 页码 2567-2576

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0271678X16671321

关键词

Stroke; cerebral hemodynamics; cerebral blood flow; mathematical modelling; and brain ischemia

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [81471207, 81501004]
  2. Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Council [KQCX2015033117354152, JSGG20150602143414338]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fractional pressure ratio is introduced to quantitatively assess the hemodynamic significance of severe intracranial stenosis. A computational fluid dynamics-based method is proposed to non-invasively compute the FPRCFD and compared against fractional pressure ratio measured by an invasive technique. Eleven patients with severe intracranial stenosis considered for endovascular intervention were recruited and an invasive procedure was performed to measure the distal and the aortic pressure (P-d and P-a). The fractional pressure ratio was calculated as Pd/Pa. The computed tomography angiography was used to reconstruct three-dimensional (3D) arteries for each patient. Cerebral hemodynamics was then computed for the arteries using a mathematical model governed by Navier-Stokes equations and with the outflow conditions imposed by a model of distal resistance and compliance. The non-invasive Pd-CFD, Pa-CFD, and FPRCFD were then obtained from the computational fluid dynamics calculation using a 16-core parallel computer. The invasive and non-invasive parameters were tested by statistical analysis. For this group of patients, the computational fluid dynamics method achieved comparable results with the invasive measurements. The fractional pressure ratio and FPRCFD are very close and highly correlated, but not linearly proportional, with the percentage of stenosis. The proposed computational fluid dynamics method can potentially be useful in assessing the functional alteration of cerebral stenosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据