4.5 Article

Racial/ethnic and gender disparities in child protection decision-making: What role do stereotypes play?

期刊

CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT
卷 127, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105579

关键词

Child protection; Decision-making; Ethnic/racial disparities; Gender disparities; Stereotype content model; Intersectionality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study investigated racial/ethnic and gender disparities in child protection decision-making and explored whether these disparities were mediated by stereotypes. Though no significant association between stereotypes and disparities was found, the study revealed that perceptions of morality impacted decision-making processes.
Background: A wide range of studies have revealed racial/ethnic and gender disparities in child protection decision-making.Objective: This study investigated whether disparities are mediated by stereotypes that professionals may hold, by applying the Stereotype Content Model (SCM) which suggests that stereotypes are formed by perceptions of sociability, morality, and competence. Participants and setting: 258 professionals (133 current staff and 125 trainees) from Colorado participated in the study.Methods: The study applied a 2 x 3 randomized experimental vignette design. Participants read a case in which the gender of the parent responsible for maltreatment (mother or father) and race/ ethnicity of the family (white, Black, or Latinx) varied.Results: A SEM model (CFI = .94, RMSEA = .05) with free parameters for trainees and current staff was estimated. No significant association between stereotypes and race/ethnicity and gender appeared. However, evidence for disparities emerged. In the trainee group, scores to decide for a supervision order were higher for white fathers, Black mothers, Latinx mothers, and Latinx fathers (beta = 0.18 to 0.25) compared to white mothers. Current staff provided larger risk scores for Black mothers and both Latinx parents (beta = 0.20 to 0.22) compared to the white mother, resulting in increased inclinations to decide for a supervision order (beta = 0.26). Lastly, negative perceptions of morality increased supervision order scores (beta =-0.55 to-0.36).Conclusions: Evidence for disparities in decision-making appeared, but the study could not confirm that these disparities were mediated by stereotypes. Furthermore, perceptions of morality seemed to impact decision-making processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据