4.8 Article

Exploring the asymmetric impact of economic policy uncertainty on China's carbon emissions trading market price: Do different types of uncertainty matter?

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121601

关键词

Carbon emission trading; Policy uncertainty; Nonlinear ARDL model; Asymmetry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article examines the impact of four economic policy uncertainties on China's carbon emissions trading market price. The results show that trade policy uncertainty and monetary policy uncertainty have positive effects on the market price, while exchange rate policy uncertainty has a negative influence. Furthermore, an increase in policy uncertainties has a greater impact on the market price.
Carbon allowance is a market mechanism that is used to deal with climate change in the scientific community, and is gradually regarded as a financial asset. Uncertainty plays a vital role in affecting financial assets, and whether it affects carbon prices is an important question. Therefore, this article aims to examine the impact of four economic policy uncertainties (EPU) on China's carbon emissions trading (CET) market price from the year 2013 to 2021, by employing the nonlinear ARDL model and the asymmetric causality test. Empirical results show that the trade policy uncertainty (TPU) and monetary policy uncertainty (MPU), both positively affect the CET market price, while the exchange rate policy uncertainty (ECPU) comes with negative influences. Furthermore, the increase of TPU, MPU, and ECPU has a greater impact on the CET price. Our findings are consistent with the real effects of uncertainty shocks by Bloom (2009) who asserts that the uncertainty transfer mechanism has an asymmetric pattern. Therefore, policymakers should pay careful attention to the increasing fluctuations of different economic policies. Moreover, Chinese authorities should adopt firmer policy stances to avoid high volatility in the CET market price to achieve the goal of low-cost emission reductions through market mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据