4.4 Article

Verbalisation of attention regulation strategies and background music enhance extinction learning and retention

期刊

BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY
卷 150, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2022.104037

关键词

Pavlovian conditioning; Extinction; Verbalisation strategies; Music; Anxiety

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have shown that verbalisation strategies combined with non-lyrical background music can prevent relapse and positively change stimulus evaluations during extinction.
Relapse and return of fear are common following exposure-based treatments which aim to decrease anxiety by reducing danger expectancies and negative stimulus evaluations. Using Pavlovian conditioning and extinction procedures, recent studies found that verbalising catchphrases to prompt attention to, and memory of, stimulus contingencies during extinction prevented US expectancy generalisation to safe stimuli and reduced anxiety ratings. Verbalizations did not improve negative evaluations of conditional stimuli. Given that negative evaluations predict return of fear, the current study examined whether verbalisation strategies combined with listening to liked, non-lyrical background music enhanced expectancy learning and positively changed stimulus evaluations. A differential Pavlovian conditioning procedure was used involving fear acquisition, extinction, and extinction retest phases. Participants were assigned to a verbalisation condition (N = 21), a verbalisation plus liked, non-lyrical music condition (N = 21) or a control condition (N = 21) during extinction. The verbalisation strategies, with and without music, prevented the generalisation of US expectancies to safe stimuli at retest. Verbalisation strategies plus music increased positive evaluations of conditional stimuli during extinction and retest. Further research on the role of verbalising attention regulation strategies and liked, non-lyrical background music during extinction is warranted with clinical samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据