The effect of inconsistent steering guidance during transitions from Highly Automated Driving

This driving simulator study investigated the effect of inconsistent steering guidance during system and userinitiated transitions from Highly Automated Driving (HAD). In particular, the aim of the study was to understand if steering conflicts could be achieved by adopting inconsistent steering guidance and whether these conflicts could be exploited to accelerate drivers' steering engagement within a limited time. Inconsistent steering guidance was generated by switching the guidance on and off at 3 different frequencies (0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 Hz). Results revealed that steering engagement has more to do with the initiation rather than the quality of the steering guidance. In fact, drivers were more engaged with the steering task when they initiated the transition themselves. Compared to system-initiated transitions, in user-initiated ones, drivers exerted stronger steering inputs throughout the transition, which allowed them to maintain larger Time To Lane Crossing (TTLC) values with fewer steering corrections. During system-initiated transitions, drivers started to actively engage with the steering activity only after more than 5 s from the start of the transition but were able to achieve a steering behaviour close to the one shown during user-initiated transitions at 10 s.

Automated summary

The study found that drivers' steering engagement is more influenced by the transition initiation rather than the quality of guidance. In user-initiated transitions, drivers exert stronger steering inputs, allowing them to maintain larger TTLC values with fewer corrections.