4.6 Article

Substitution versus wealth: Dual effects of non-pastoral income on livestock herd size

期刊

WORLD DEVELOPMENT
卷 151, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105749

关键词

Livestock herd size; Non-pastoral income; Substitution effect; U-shaped; Wealth effect

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71963027]
  2. Inner Mongolia Natural Science Founda-tion [2018MS07001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the nonlinear impact of non-pastoral income on livestock herd size in pastoral areas in Inner Mongolia, China. It suggests that non-pastoral income has both substitution and wealth effects on livestock herd size, leading to a U-shaped relationship. Initial increase in non-pastoral income results in decreased herd size due to partial substitution, but continued increase enables additional animal production and may lead to overgrazing.
This study examines the non-linear impact of non-pastoral income on livestock herd size using balanced panel data collected through surveys in 2013, 2016, and 2018 in pastoral areas in Inner Mongolia, China. Unlike previous studies, this analysis proposes that non-pastoral income has both substitution and wealth effects on livestock herd size. Our theoretical model and empirical result reveal a U-shaped relationship between non-pastoral income and livestock herd size. Initial increase in non-pastoral income and employment partially substitutes out livestock production, resulting in decreased livestock herd size. However, with continued increase in non-pastoral income, the wealth effect begins to dominate. Due to the inability to trade pasture ownership and inefficient transfer of use rights given the current Chinese land tenure system, wealth accumulated through non-pastoral income may enable additional animal production, which leads to increased livestock herd size and possible overgrazing. Our findings suggest sustainable use and management of pastures should consider the nonlinear impact of non-pastoral income under the prevailing land tenure system. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据