4.4 Article

Priming the Concept of Fullness with Visual Sequences Reduces Portion Size Choice in Online Food Ordering

期刊

JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH
卷 60, 期 1, 页码 NP1-NP18

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/00222437221105028

关键词

visual sequence; fullness priming; portion size choice; online food ordering; behavioral interventions

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By presenting sequential images of food from partial to whole, this research demonstrates that hunger perceptions and portion size choices can be reduced in online food ordering. The brief and low-cost intervention can be implemented across various online food-ordering contexts and has important public policy implications.
Body mass indices and obesity rates are increasing worldwide, and one way to reduce caloric intake is to reduce portion size choice. In this research, the authors develop a behavioral intervention aimed at reducing portion size choices in the context of online food ordering. In eight experiments (including a field experiment), the authors show that the sequential presentation of two food images that move from partial to whole reduces hunger perceptions and portion size choices relative to all comparable sequences. This effect occurs because the partial-to-whole image presentation primes the concept of reaching fullness, which in turn reduces perceptions of hunger and portion size choices. The effect of image sequence on both hunger perceptions and portion size choices is mediated by the accessibility of the concept full and is attenuated when visualization of the dynamic sequence (partial-to-whole) is inhibited. The partial-to-whole sequence effect is observed even when the sequential images are unrelated to food, and it is robust across languages, age groups, food type, and choice contexts. This brief, low-cost intervention can be implemented across several online food-ordering contexts (e.g., school cafeteria apps, dieting apps) and has important public policy implications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据