相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。Unlock ways to share data on peer review
Flaminio Squazzoni et al.
NATURE (2020)
A scoping review of simulation models of peer review
Thomas Feliciani et al.
SCIENTOMETRICS (2019)
Mavericks and lotteries
Shahar Avin
STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE (2019)
Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications
Elizabeth L. Pier et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2018)
The wisdom of collective grading and the effects of epistemic and semantic diversity
Aidan Lyon et al.
THEORY AND DECISION (2018)
Does Peer Review Identify the Best Papers? A Simulation Study of Editors, Reviewers, and the Scientific Publication Process
Justin Esarey
PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS (2017)
The future of societal impact assessment using peer review: pre-evaluation training, consensus building and inter-reviewer reliability
Gemma Derrick et al.
PALGRAVE COMMUNICATIONS (2017)
Identifying Expertise to Extract the Wisdom of Crowds
David V. Budescu et al.
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE (2015)
Grant Peer Review: Improving Inter-Rater Reliability with Training
David N. Sattler et al.
PLOS ONE (2015)
Modelling Research Policy: Ex-Ante Evaluation of Complex Policy Instruments
Petra Ahrweiler et al.
JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION (2015)
Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy
M. Granger Morgan
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2014)
Grant Application Review: The Case of Transparency
David Gurwitz et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2014)
Bias in peer review
Carole J. Lee et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2013)
Use of Expert Panels to Define the Reference Standard in Diagnostic Research: A Systematic Review of Published Methods and Reporting
Loes C. M. Bertens et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2013)
Opening the Black-Box of Peer Review: An Agent-Based Model of Scientist Behaviour
Flaminio Squazzoni et al.
JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION (2013)
Panel discussion does not improve reliability of peer review for medical research grant proposals
Mikael Fogelholm et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2012)
Peer Review of Grant Applications: Criteria Used and Qualitative Study of Reviewer Practices
Hendy Abdoul et al.
PLOS ONE (2012)
The IPCC AR5 guidance note on consistent treatment of uncertainties: a common approach across the working groups
Michael D. Mastrandrea et al.
CLIMATIC CHANGE (2011)
Peer-review in a world with rational scientists: Toward selection of the average
S. Thurner et al.
EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B (2011)
Peer Review, Program Officers and Science Funding
Paul J. Roebber et al.
PLOS ONE (2011)
Social Simulation That 'Peers into Peer Review'
Flaminio Squazzoni et al.
JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION (2011)
A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants
Lutz Bornmann et al.
PLOS ONE (2010)
PEER REVIEWER TRAINING AND EDITOR SUPPORT: RESULTS FROM AN INTERNATIONAL SURVEY OF NURSING PEER REVIEWERS
Margaret Comerford Freda et al.
JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING (2009)
Uncertainty communication in environmental assessments: views from the Dutch science-policy interface
J. Arjan Wardekker et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY (2008)
Simple robust averages of forecasts: Some empirical results
Victor Richmond R. Jose et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING (2008)
The relationship of previous training and experience of journal peer reviewers to subsequent review quality
Michael L. Callaham et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2007)
Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial
S Schroter et al.
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2004)
The decision-making constraints and processes of grant peer review, and their effects on the review outcome
L Langfeldt
SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE (2001)
分享论文
