4.5 Letter

Reply to technical comment on Jonason, P. K., & Luoto, S. (2021). The dark side of the rainbow: Homosexuals and bisexuals have higher Dark Triad traits than heterosexuals. Personality and Individual Differences, 181, 111040

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111435

关键词

Sexual orientation; Homosexuality; Bisexuality; Dark Triad; Personality; Life history; Individual differences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The authors address methodological concerns raised by critics and discuss the potential adaptive response of elevated Dark Triad traits in nonheterosexual individuals to environmental harshness. They reject prejudiced views of homosexuality and advocate for continuing to use the term homosexual as a purely descriptive scientific term.
We thank Sharpe and colleagues for the opportunity to discuss our article titled The dark side of the rainbow: Homosexuals and bisexuals have higher Dark Triad traits than heterosexuals in more detail. Here, we address the methodological concerns raised by Sharpe et al. and conclude by discussing our critics' suggestion that the findings on Dark Triad traits can reinforce negative stereotypes about nonheterosexual people. As scientists, we avoid moralizing on such topics, instead openly reporting the results of our research, even hypothesizing that elevated Dark Triad traits in nonheterosexual individuals might constitute an adaptive response or a predictive adaptive response to environmental harshness, whether such harshness may be experienced prenatally, in adolescence, or in adulthood. We further wish to reject and distance ourselves from any prejudiced views of homosexuality. The suggestion to avoid the term homosexuality is in itself prejudiced and in stark opposition to the liberation and empowerment of people with same-sex sexual attractions. We encourage other sex researchers to continue using the term homosexual as a purely descriptive scientific term which carries no moral implications, and the relevant communities and organizations to accept its continued use in science alongside other sexual orientation categories.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据