4.7 Article

Investigating the mechanism through which consumers are inspired by social media influencers and inspired to adopt influencers' exemplars as social defaults

期刊

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH
卷 144, 期 -, 页码 264-277

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.071

关键词

Influencer marketing; Social media influencers; Consumer inspiration; Social defaults; Choice imitation behavior

类别

资金

  1. Institute of Textiles and Clothing at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University [BE1Q]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drawing on customer inspiration and social default theories, this study investigated the mechanism by which consumers are inspired by social media influencers (SMIs) and inspired to adopt the SMIs' exemplars as their own social defaults. The findings suggest that consumers' inspiration is influenced by the attractiveness, credibility, closeness, and interactivity of SMIs, and their inspired state affects their behavioral and emotional responses.
Drawing on customer inspiration and social default theories, we investigated the mechanism by which consumers are inspired by social media influencers (SMIs) and inspired to adopt the SMIs' exemplars as their own social defaults (standard default options that are socially desirable to like and follow). We investigated whether SMIs' personality-determined traits [attractiveness (H1) and credibility (H2)] and content-determined traits [closeness (H3) and interactivity (H4)] led consumers to feel inspired by SMIs; whether consumers' inspired by state led them to feel inspired to adopt the SMIs' exemplars as their own social defaults (H5); and whether consumers' inspired to state affected their behavioral and emotional responses: choice imitation (H6) and social glue (H7). To offer more nuanced implications, we examined whether the inspiration mechanism between consumers and SMIs differed between male and female consumers. We analyzed our model via SEM and probit regression analyses using survey data from 455 U.S. consumers' responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据