4.7 Article

How Positive and Negative Emotions Promote Ritualistic Consumption Through Different Mechanisms

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901572

关键词

ritualistic consumption; positive emotion; negative emotion; sense of control; interesting experiences

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71902069, 71872070]
  2. Social Science Foundation Project of Jilin Provincial Department of Education [JJKH20211262SK]
  3. Interdisciplinary Integration Innovation Project of Jilin University [JLUXKJC2020305]
  4. Social Science Fund of Jilin [2020C060]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ritualistic consumption integrates ritual elements into product design and usage, offering new and interesting experiences and a sense of control. Both positive and negative emotions can promote ritualistic consumption tendencies, but their underlying psychological mechanisms are different. Positive emotions arouse consumers' desire for interesting experiences, while negative emotions stimulate their need for control, both leading to a preference for ritualistic consumption. Our research provides theoretical contributions and practical inspiration for emotional marketing.
Ritualistic consumption refers to integrating ritual elements into the process of product design and usage. By conducting three studies, we find that ritualistic consumption can offer new and interesting experiences and help consumers gain a sense of control. Both positive and negative emotions can promote ritualistic consumption tendencies. However, their underlying psychological mechanisms are different. Specifically, positive emotion can arouse consumers' desire for interesting experience and thus promotes their preference for ritualistic consumption, while negative emotion can arouse consumers' need for control and thus promote their preference for ritualistic consumption. Our research results offer a theoretical contribution and practical inspiration for emotional marketing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据