3.9 Article

Followership: an undervalued concept in effective teams within the military and NHS

期刊

BMJ MILITARY HEALTH
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjmilitary-2021-002039

关键词

EDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training); Organisational development; Quality in health care; MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

资金

  1. UK Ministry of Defence (Ministry of Defence)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the level of followership among military doctors at different stages of their career and proposed recommendations on how followership concepts can be used to develop oneself and better understand the challenges of small team working.
Introduction Leadership is accepted as a crucial component of effective working within teams. Followership's contribution to successful performance is increasingly recognised but understudied. This study evaluated followership levels in military doctors at different stages of their careers and made recommendations for how followership concepts can be used to develop the self and better understand the challenges of small team working. Methods A self-report study in which Kelley's followership questionnaire was distributed to 64 military doctors in three cohorts. 53 results were assessed using Kelley's followership framework. Subgroup analysis was undertaken to look at differences depending on service, age, gender and career stage. Results The study demonstrated a predominant exemplary followership style within military doctors. No statistical difference was identified at the 0.05 level in followership by career stage, age, gender or service in the sample group. Conclusion This study gives insight into the attributes of doctors within the Defence Medical Services and laid out a methodology for further cohort evaluations of followership. It made recommendations on the areas of the field that require further research and how followership concepts may be included in further development courses and reporting for military medical personnel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据