4.7 Article

Biological characteristics of the gluten-free sourdough system fermented by Lactobacillus plantarum ST-III and its effect on dough quality and nutritional value during freezing

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY-X
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100350

关键词

Lactobacillus plantarum ST-III; Tartary buckwheat sourdough; Frozen dough

资金

  1. Capacity Project of Local Colleges and Universities of the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai, China [22010504000]
  2. Shanghai Natural Science Foundation [20ZR1455800]
  3. China Agriculture Research System [CARS-08-D2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the biological characteristics of wheat, tartary buckwheat, and wheat-tartary buckwheat sourdough systems fermented by Lactobacillus plantarum ST-III at different times, and investigated the quality and nutrition of sourdough frozen dough bread products with different fermentation substrates. It was found that the tartary buckwheat sourdough system can delay the degradation of bread quality and nutrition.
In this study, the biological characteristics of wheat, tartary buckwheat, and wheat-tartary buckwheat sourdough systems fermented by Lactobacillus plantarum ST-III at different times were explored, and the quality and nutritional characteristics of sourdough frozen dough bread products with different fermentation substrates were investigated. Comparing the metabolic properties of sourdough during fermentation, it was found that the density of colony growth in TBS was the best, when fermented for 12 h, the protein degradation effect was the best, and the content of EPS (3.109 g/kg) and free amino acid was the highest. Although the quality of fresh TBS bread was worse than that of WS, after 13 weeks of frozen storage, the quality deterioration of TBS frozen dough bread was the smallest, the water migration rate was slower, and the protein digestibility was higher. Therefore, tartary buckwheat sourdough system can delay the degradation of bread quality and nutrition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据