4.7 Article

Linear and non-linear rheological properties of water-ethanol hybrid pectin gels for aroma enhancement

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY-X
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100328

关键词

Pectin; Ethanol; Gel; Rheology; Large amplitude oscillatory shear; Aroma release

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation Project of Chongqing [cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0025]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [XDJK2020C051]
  3. Venture and Innovation Support Program for Chongqing Overseas Returnees [cx2019119]
  4. Technology Innovation and Application Development Special funds of Chongqing [cstc2019jscx-dxwtBX0031, cstc2021jscx-tpyzxX0019]
  5. Exclusive Project on Guidance and Performance Stimulation for Scientific Institutions of Chongqing [cstc2020jxjl80005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rheological properties of water-ethanol hybrid pectin gels were studied in this work, revealing that ethanol concentration significantly affects gel strength and aroma retention.
Whereas water???ethanol hybrid gels present an opportunity to realize aroma enhancement, translating hypothesis into practice is limited by poorly defined viscoelastic characteristics of those gels. In this work, the linear and non-linear rheological properties of water???ethanol hybrid pectin gels (WEPGs) were studied. Those WEPGs are physical gels in nature and the WEPG of 28.6% v/v ethanol differs basically from those of higher ethanol concentrations in the gel strength, resistance to deformation and non-linear properties. The retention of isopentyl acetate of WEPGs is dramatically improved by increasing the ethanol concentration to 33.3% v/v in the cosolvent system, but it is not further improved at 37.5% v/v. The cluster analysis reveals strong positive correlations between the isopentyl acetate release concentration and v3/v1 and absolute value of S/T ratio under 100% strain, suggesting the non-linear rheological responses of WEPGs have to be taken into account for which the enhancement of aroma is desired.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据