4.3 Article

Survey of US Oncologists Practices and Beliefs Regarding DPYD Testing Before Fluoropyrimidine Chemotherapy

期刊

JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE
卷 18, 期 6, 页码 456-+

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/OP.21.00874

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Celgene (Inst)
  2. Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst)
  3. Agios (Inst)
  4. Incyte (Inst)
  5. Clovis Oncology (Inst)
  6. Debiopharm Group (Inst)
  7. FibroGen (Inst)
  8. Halozyme (Inst)
  9. MedImmune (Inst)
  10. Ipsen (Inst)
  11. Exelixis (Inst)
  12. Rafael Pharmaceuticals (Inst)
  13. Syros Pharmaceuticals (Inst)
  14. Relay Therapeutics (Inst)
  15. Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (Inst)
  16. Actuate Therapeutics (Inst)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study describes the current practice of pretreatment DPYD testing in the United States and identifies factors deterring oncologists from ordering testing. The results show that the clinical adoption of pretreatment DPYD testing is extremely limited in the United States, with low prevalence of DPD deficiency and lack of clinical practice guideline recommendations being the main barriers.
PURPOPSE Patients who carry reduced-activity DPYD polymorphisms have increased fluoropyrimidine (FP) toxicity risk. Although pretreatment DPYD testing is recommended throughout most of Europe, it is not recommended in the United States, and adoption has been limited. The objective of this survey was to describe the current practice in the United States regarding pretreatment DPYD testing and understand the factors deterring oncologists from ordering testing. METHODS Survey invitations were e-mailed to 325 medical oncologists practicing in the United States who are members of the SWOG Cancer Research Network Gastrointestinal Cancer, Breast Cancer, or Early Therapeutics Committees. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate survey responses. RESULTS Responses were collected from 59 (18.2%) US medical oncologists, of whom 98% strongly or somewhat agree that patients with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency have increased toxicity risk and 96% would modify FP dosing for a patient with known DPD deficiency. However, only 32% strongly or somewhat agree that pretreatment DPYD testing is useful to inform FP treatment, 20% have ever ordered pretreatment testing, and 3% order testing for at least 10% of their FP-treated patients. The most important factors that deter oncologists from ordering testing were low prevalence of DPD deficiency (54%) and lack of clinical practice guideline recommendations (48%). CONCLUSION Clinical adoption of pretreatment DPYD testing is extremely limited in the United States. Utilization may be substantially increased by inclusion in the oncology clinical practice guideline recommendations, coverage through health insurance, and potentially education of medical oncologists regarding available treatment modification guidelines. (C) 2022 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据