4.7 Article

Experimental investigation and prediction of shear capacity for UHPC beams

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01097

关键词

UHPC; Beam; Shear-span to depth ratio; Reinforcement; Failure mode; Shear capacity prediction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51878399, 52038006]
  2. School of Engineering and Built Environment
  3. Griffith University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the shear behavior of UHPC beams and found that the shear span to depth ratio is inversely proportional to the shear bearing capacity. A comparative study was conducted to evaluate the existing shear capacity prediction formulas and a new modified formula was proposed.
As a novel green material, Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) has favourable application prospects. Currently, the ultimate shear capacity design of UHPC beam is carried out using empirical or semi-empirical methods. These methods involve approximations, which are not always reliable, and their scope of application is limited. In the view of this, a shear test was conducted on eight rectangular UHPC beams. The shear span to depth ratio (1.5, 2, 2.5, 3) and longitudinal reinforcement ratio (5.6%,6.2%,7.1%) were designated as the experimental parameters. In addition, the failure mode, shear capacity and crack pattern were observed and analysed. The results indicated that the shear-span to depth ratio is inversely proportional to the shear bearing capacity and is dominant to the shear failure mode. Although a higher longitudinal reinforcement ratio can slightly improve the shear capacity, it has no impact on the shear failure mode. Based on the outcome of this work, a comparative study was performed to evaluate the current shear capacity prediction formulas, and a new modified formula was proposed. The proposed design equation was compared to the results from literatures, confirming that the modified equation is accurate and reliable with mean ratio 1.03 and a better the proportion of the variation of 0.96.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据