4.8 Article

Subject independent emotion recognition from EEG using VMD and deep learning

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.11.003

关键词

Variational Mode Decomposition; Valence-Arousal model; Deep Neural Network; Affective computing; Intrinsic-mode functions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Emotion recognition from EEG is important in subject-independent situations. This paper proposes a subject-independent emotion recognition technique using VMD and Deep Neural Network, and achieves better performance compared to state-of-the-art techniques, as validated by the DEAP dataset.
Emotion recognition from Electroencephalography (EEG) is proved to be a good choice as it cannot be mimicked like speech signals or facial expressions. EEG signals of emotions are not unique and it varies from person to person as each one has different emotional responses to the same stimuli. Thus EEG signals are subject dependent and proved to be effective for subject dependent emotion recognition. However, subject independent emotion recognition plays an important role in situations like emotion recognition from paralyzed or burnt face, where EEG of emotions of the subjects before the incidents are not available to build the emotion recognition model. Hence there is a need to identify common EEG patterns corresponds to each emotion independent of the subjects. In this paper, a subject independent emotion recognition technique is proposed from EEG signals using Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD) as a feature extraction technique and Deep Neural Network as the classifier. The performance evaluation of the proposed method with the benchmark DEAP dataset shows that the combination of VMD and Deep Neural Network performs better compared to the state of the art techniques in subject-independent emotion recognition from EEG. (c) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据