4.5 Article

Effects of intervention on lifestyle changes among coronary artery disease patients: A 6-month follow-up study

期刊

NURSING OPEN
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 2024-2036

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1212

关键词

coronary artery disease; effects of intervention; lifestyle; risk factors

类别

资金

  1. Finnish Cultural Foundation
  2. Pirkanmaa Regional Fund [50201302]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a nurse-led lifestyle-related risk factor modification intervention on multiple lifestyle behaviors among coronary artery disease patients. The results showed that, at 6-month follow-up, the intervention group showed significant improvements in diet, medication adherence, physical activity, and perceived stress compared to the control group.
Aim: The main aim of the study was to investigate the effects of a nurse-led lifestyle-related risk factor modification intervention on multiple lifestyle behaviours among coronary artery disease patients over six months. Design: A pre-test post-test control group design was conducted in a single clinical centre in Nepal. Methods: A total of 224 eligible patients were randomly assigned to either the usual care group or the intervention group at baseline. The lifestyle intervention consisted of a brief counselling session supplemented with informational leaflets. Standard questionnaires were used to collect self-reported data from patients on multiple lifestyle behaviours: diet, physical activity, adherence to medication, stress, body mass index, smoking and alcohol consumption. General linear model repeated measure analysis was used to estimate the effect of intervention. Results: A statistically significant effect of study group-by-time interaction for diet, adherence to medication, physical activity, and perceived stress was found at 6-month follow-up. Overall, greater improvement in lifestyle habits was found in the intervention group compared with the control group at 6-month follow-up.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据