4.6 Article

A pilot project for the long-term structural health monitoring of historic city gates

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13349-022-00563-7

关键词

Historical city gate; Structural health monitoring (SHM); Operational modal analysis (OMA); Optimal sensor position (OSP); Fisher information matrix (FIM)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reports on a pilot project for long-term structural health monitoring of historical city gates. The optimal sensor position for reliable structural health monitoring procedures is discussed with reference to the San Niccolo gate in Florence.
This paper reports on a pilot project for long-term structural health monitoring of historical city gates. This structural typology is what today remains of the defensive structures that characterised the medieval centres of many European cities. Even though in the last years the scientific community has paid great attention to the structural analysis and on the structural health monitoring of masonry towers, which are apparently similar to the typology of city gates, only a few studies explicitly approach such heritage buildings. In most cases, the surviving gates are immersed in the daily vehicular-traffic flows and hence continuously subjected to traffic-induced vibration. Consequently, a key point both for their conservation is the assessment of the optimal sensors position to be used for reliable structural health monitoring procedures. These issues are here discussed with reference to a specific case: the San Niccolo gate in Florence (Italy). First, an expeditious experimental campaign performed with a reduced number of accelerometers is reported. This test is aimed to identify a numerical model that is subsequently employed to design the optimal sensor position of long-term structural monitoring. This optimal sensor grid must be assessed to ensure a low-cost and sustainable dynamic monitoring system but, at the same time, to maximize the information contents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据