4.5 Article

Progranulin deficiency leads to severe inflammation, lung injury and cell death in a mouse model of endotoxic shock

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 20, 期 3, 页码 506-517

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.12756

关键词

progranulin; lipopolysaccharide; endotoxic shock; inflammation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81300384, 81102229, 21302112, 81201262]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2012HQ013, ZR2012HQ002]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University [2014JC019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Progranulin (PGRN) is a crucial secreted growth factor involved in various kinds of physiologic and disease processes and often has a protective role in inflammatory diseases. This study was designed to investigate the protective effects of PGRN on endotoxic shock in a mouse model of PGRN deficiency. After lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection to induce endotoxic shock in mice, PGRN levels were induced in wild-type (WT) mice at 6 and 24 hrs. Survival rate analysis, haematoxylin and eosin staining, immunohistochemical staining, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and in situ terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated uridine triphosphate nick-end labelling assay were used to reveal the susceptibility, lung injury, inflammatory cell infiltration, production of inflammatory mediators and lung cell death in mice after LPS injection. PGRN-deficient (Grn(-/-)) mice were highly susceptible to LPS-induced endotoxic shock, with decreased survival, severe lung injury, increased production of pro-inflammatory mediators, and inflammatory cell infiltration and apoptotic death in the lung. Additionally, recombinant PGRN (rPGRN) administration before LPS stimulation ameliorated the survival of and abnormalities in both WT and Grn(-/-) mice. Altogether, these findings indicate that PGRN may be a novel biologic agent with therapeutic potential for endotoxic shock probably by inhibiting LPS-induced systemic and local inflammation in mice for treating endotoxic shock.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据