4.5 Article

Leukapheresis in Pediatric Acute Leukemia with Hyperleukocytosis: A Single-Center Experience

期刊

CHILDREN-BASEL
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/children9040503

关键词

leukostasis; leukapheresis; acute leukemia; hyperleukocytosis; children

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hyperleukocytosis in pediatric acute leukemia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The use of leukapheresis (LPH) for its management is still controversial. This study reviewed data from a single institution over a 10-year period and compared the characteristics and outcomes of newly diagnosed leukemia patients with hyperleukocytosis who received LPH and those who did not. The results showed that LPH was safe, well tolerated, and did not alter time to chemotherapy at the institution.
Hyperleukocytosis in pediatric acute leukemia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality and at present there is no consensus on the use of leukapheresis (LPH) for its management. Our aim was to review characteristics and outcomes of newly diagnosed leukemia patients with hyperleukocytosis (HL) comparing those who received LPH and those who did not. An IRB approved retrospective case control study reviewed data from a single institution over a 10 year period. At our institution, LPH was used in 8 of 62 (13%) patients with hyperleukocytosis with minimal complications. Mean leukocyte count in patients who received LPH versus those who did not was 498 k cells/mm(3) and 237 k cells/m(3), respectively. Patients who had symptoms of neurologic (63 vs. 17%) or pulmonary leukostasis (75 vs. 17%) were more likely to have undergone leukapheresis. The time from presentation to the initiation of chemotherapy was not different between those who received LPH and those who did not (mean of 35 h vs. 34 h). There was one death in the LPH group, that was the result of neurologic sequelae of hyperleukocytosis and not LPH itself. The use of LPH in patients with hyperleukocytosis is safe, well tolerated and does not alter time to chemotherapy at our institution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据