4.5 Article

Experimental and Numerical Studies of Ignition Delay Time and Laminar Flame Speed of JP-10 at Elevated Temperature Conditions

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2022.910304

关键词

JP-10 fuel; laminar flame speed; ignition delay time; kinetic mechanism analysis; bunsen flame

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51906016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the laminar flame speeds of JP-10/air mixtures and ignition delay time of JP-10/O-2/Ar mixtures through experimental measurements and numerical simulations. The results show a temperature dependence of laminar flame speed and identify key reactions that determine the flame speed and ignition delay time.
In this work, the laminar flame speeds of JP-10/air mixtures and ignition delay time of JP-10/O-2/Ar mixtures have been studied over a wide range of experimental conditions using a premixed Bunsen flame and a shock tube. Laminar flame speed measurements of the JP-10/air mixture were measured at T = 360-453 K, phi = 0.7-1.3 and p = 1 atm. The ignition delay times of JP-10 with fuel mole fraction of 0.2% JP-10/2.8% O-2/97% Ar were measured with a heated shock tube behind the reflected shock wave at 1183-1478 K and pressure of 3.4 atm. Numerical calculation and sensitivity analysis of the laminar flame speed and ignition delay time of JP-10 were performed by using published detailed and skeletal kinetic mechanisms. The comparison of experimental and numerical results showed that all models tend to overestimate the laminar flame speed under the studied conditions, especially under lower temperature conditions (360-423 K). A temperature dependency empirical correlation of laminar flame speed was then proposed by power law theory. The sensitivity analysis identified three important reactions [H+O-2 = O+OH, C5H5+H (+M) = C5H6(+M), C3H3+C2H2 = C5H5] that determined the laminar flame speed and ignition delay time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据