4.6 Article

Can Industrial Relocation Reduce Air Pollution? Evidence From a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.910668

关键词

industrial relocation; air pollution; difference-in-differences method; spillover effect; China

资金

  1. National Social Science Foundation of China [21CJL016]
  2. Social Science Foundation of Nantong [2021CNT002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To combat air pollution caused by rapid industrialization, China has implemented the National Industrial Relocation Demonstration Zones (NIRDZs) policy. Through panel data analysis of 285 prefecture-level cities, this study finds that industrial relocation has an inhibitory effect on SO2 emissions, with significant local effects in the first 5 years and spillover effects limited to a range of 50-100 km. Mechanism analysis suggests that the NIRDZs policy achieves air emission reduction by rationalizing and upgrading the industrial structure.
To reduce the increasingly severe air pollution caused by rapid industrialization, China has introduced a National Industrial Relocation Demonstration Zones (NIRDZs) policy. This paper takes the NIRDZs as a quasi-natural experiment and employs the difference-in-differences (DID) method to test the effects of industrial relocation on air pollution based on panel data of 285 prefecture-level cities from 2003 to 2018. Results show that the NIRDZs have an inhibitory effect on SO2 emissions, although their local effect is significant in the first 5 years and their spillover effect only occurs within 50-100 km. Mechanism analysis reveals that the NIRDZs reduce air emissions by rationalizing and upgrading the industrial structure. Additionally, further discussions suggest that cities with moderate administrative areas and abundant natural resources should be prioritized as pilot cities, and industries including nonferrous metals, steel, automotive, new energy, new materials, and producer services should be designated as priority industries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据