4.6 Article

Research on the Advance Role of Institutional Quality on Achieving Environmental Efficiency in Sub Sahara Africa

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.845433

关键词

institutional quality indicators; data envelopment analysis (DEA); generalized method of moment (GMM); environmental efficiency; EKC (environment kuznets curve)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71503105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the relationship between environmental efficiency and institutional quality in Sub-Sahara Africa. The results show that corruption control and regulatory quality decrease environmental efficiency, while government effectiveness increases it.
The study investigates the impact of institutional quality on environmental efficiency in the presence of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) using data on desirable and undesirable outputs as well as institutional quality dimensions from the World Governance Indicators (WGI) for 19 Sub-Sahara African (SSA) countries over an annual period from 2005 to 2014. Environmental efficiency was low in eight SSA countries and excellent in eleven others, according to the efficiency results. Two countries had the highest average environmental efficiency over the first period, while one had the lowest. In 2013, the majority of SSA countries had high efficiency indexes, with one country having an index of 2.098 and four countries having efficiency rates of one. After controlling for industrialization, energy consumption, and population variables, the results show that corruption control and regulatory quality lower environmental efficiency while government effectiveness increases. The DH causality test revealed that environmental efficiency, control of corruption, regulatory quality, energy consumption, and population had no causal relationship. There are also one-way causal linkages between environmental efficiency and government effectiveness and industrialization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据