4.6 Article

An evolutionary algorithm for multi-objective optimization of freshwater consumption in textile dyeing industry

期刊

PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.932

关键词

Optimization; Optimization problems; Algorithms; Evolutionary algorithms; Textile dyeing industry

资金

  1. Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project [PNURSP2022R161]
  2. Princes Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes an improved multi-objective group counseling optimizer algorithm, which shows better performance in solving problems compared to other algorithms. Additionally, applying this algorithm for optimization scheduling can significantly reduce freshwater consumption in the textile dyeing industry.
Optimization is challenging even after numerous multi-objective evolutionary algorithms have been developed. Most of the multi-objective evolutionary algorithms failed to find out the best solutions spread and took more fitness evolution value to find the best solution. This article proposes an extended version of a multi-objective group counseling optimizer called MOGCO-II. The proposed algorithm is compared with MOGCO, MOPSO, MOCLPSO, and NSGA-II using the well-known benchmark problem such as Zitzler Deb Thieler (ZDT) function. The experiments show that the proposed algorithm generates a better solution than the other algorithms. The proposed algorithm also takes less fitness evolution value to find the optimal Pareto front. Moreover, the textile dyeing industry needs a large amount of fresh water for the dyeing process. After the dyeing process, the textile dyeing industry discharges a massive amount of polluted water, which leads to serious environmental problems. Hence, we proposed a MOGCO-II based optimization scheduling model to reduce freshwater consumption in the textile dyeing industry. The results show that the optimization scheduling model reduces freshwater consumption in the textile dyeing industry by up to 35% compared to manual scheduling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据