4.6 Article

Mathematical COVID-19 model with vaccination: a case study in Saudi Arabia

期刊

PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.959

关键词

Mathematical model; Vaccination; Stability; COVID-19

资金

  1. Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [PNURSP2022R125]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The discovery and analysis of a new mathematical model provides insights into the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and their impact on reducing transmission rates, aiding governments in formulating vaccination strategies.
The discovery of a new form of corona-viruses in December 2019, SARS-CoV-2, commonly named COVID-19, has reshaped the world. With health and economic issues at stake, scientists have been focusing on understanding the dynamics of the disease, in order to provide the governments with the best policies and strategies allowing them to reduce the span of the virus. The world has been waiting for the vaccine for more than one year. The World Health Organization(WHO)is advertising the vaccine as a safe and effective measure to fight off the virus. Saudi Arabia was the fourth country in the world to start to vaccinate its population. Even with the new simplified COVID-19 rules, the third dose is still mandatory. COVID-19 vaccines have raised many questions regarding in its efficiency and its role to reduce the number of infections. In this work, we try to answer these question and propose a new mathematical model with five compartments, including susceptible, vaccinated, infectious, asymptotic and recovered individuals. We provide theoretical results regarding the effective reproduction number, the stability of endemic equilibrium and disease free equilibrium. We provide numerical analysis of the model based on the Saudi case. Our developed model shows that the vaccine reduces the transmission rate and provides an explanation to the rise in the number of new infections immediately after the start of the vaccination campaign in Saudi Arabia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据