4.7 Article

Acetone Gas Sensor Based on SWCNT/Polypyrrole/Phenyllactic Acid Nanocomposite with High Sensitivity and Humidity Stability

期刊

BIOSENSORS-BASEL
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/bios12050354

关键词

acetone gas sensor; polypyrrole-SWCNT composite; high sensitivity; room temperature; moisture resistance

资金

  1. Korea Foundation - Korean Government [2021R1F1A1105389111]
  2. Technology Innovation Program of the MOTIE [20017545]
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20017545] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, core-shell-shaped nanocomposites composed of a single-walled carbon nanotube and C8F-doped polypyrrole/phenyllatic acid were synthesized for detecting acetone gas with high sensitivity and humidity stability. The nanocomposites showed reliable detection of acetone gas at concentrations as low as 50 ppb even at 25 degrees C, which is suitable for medical diagnoses.
We synthesized core-shell-shaped nanocomposites composed of a single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) and heptadecafluorooctanesulfonic acid-doped polypyrrole (C8F-dopedPPy)/phenyllatic acid (PLA), i.e., C8F-doped-PPy/PLA@SWCNT, for detecting acetone gas with high sensitivity and humidity stability. The obtained nanocomposites have the structural features of a sensing material as a C8F-doped-PPy layer surrounding a single-stranded SWCNT, and a PLA layer on the outer surface of the PPy as a specific sensing layer for acetone. PLA was chemically combined with the positively charged PPy backbone and provided the ability to reliably detect acetone gas at concentrations as low as 50 ppb even at 25 degrees C, which is required for medical diagnoses via human breath analysis. When C8F was contained in the pyrrole monomer in a ratio of 0.1 mol, it was able to stably detect an effective signal in a relative humidity (RH) of 0-80% range.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据