4.6 Article

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.890357

关键词

irritable bowel syndrome; fecal microbiota transplantation; meta-analysis; randomized controlled trials; global IBS symptoms; subgroup analysis

资金

  1. Clinical Research Fostering Fund of Chinese PLA General Hospital [2018FC-WJFWZX-2-15]
  2. Science Technological Innovation Nursery Fund of Chinese PLA General Hospital [18KMM02]
  3. Young Scholar Medical Research Fund of Chinese PLA General Hospital [QNC19044]
  4. Medical Science and Technology Young Scholar Fostering Fund [21QNPY109]
  5. Military Key Discipline Construction Project of Chinese PLA Medical School, 13th Five-year plan [A350109]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients. The results showed that FMT did not significantly improve the overall symptoms of IBS patients, but FMT operated through invasive routes significantly improved global IBS symptoms, while FMT delivered via oral capsules had a negative impact on IBS patients.
Background:Gut microbiota has been identified as an imbalance in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a novel method to restore microbiota and treat IBS patients. ObjectiveTo conduct a meta-analysis and estimate the efficacy and safety of FMT for the treatment of IBS patients with subgroup analyses to explore the most effective way of FMT for IBS. MethodsAll eligible studies were searched from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library through multiple search strategies. Data were extracted from studies comprising the following criteria: double-blind, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy of FMT with placebo for adult patients (>= 18 years old) with IBS. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the summary relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). ResultsA total of seven RCTs comprising 489 subjects were eligible for this meta-analysis. Pooled data showed no significant improvement of global IBS symptoms in patients with FMT compared with placebo (RR = 1.34; 95% CI 0.75-2.41, p = 0.32). A significant heterogeneity was observed among the studies (I-2 = 83%, p < 0.00001). There was no significant evidence of funnel plot asymmetry (Egger's test, p = 0.719; Begg's test, p = 1.000), indicating no existence of publication bias. Subgroup analyses revealed that FMT operated by invasive routes, including gastroscope, colonoscope, and nasojejunal tube, significantly improved global IBS symptoms (RR = 1.96; 95% CI 1.23-3.11, p = 0.004) with heterogeneity (I-2 = 57%, p = 0.06) and an NNT of 3 (95% CI 2-14). However, FMT delivered via oral capsules showed a negative impact on patients with IBS (RR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.33-0.96, p = 0.03) with a low heterogeneity (I-2 = 39%, p = 0.2) and an NNH of 3 (95% CI 2-37). ConclusionThe current evidence from RCTs with all routes of FMT does not show significant global improvement in patients with IBS. However, FMT operated by invasive routes significantly improved global IBS symptoms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据