4.6 Article

Optimization of the Artemisia Polysaccharide Fermentation Process by Aspergillus niger

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.842766

关键词

Aspergillus niger; Artemisia annua polysaccharide; optimization; fermentation process; single factor; response surface

资金

  1. Academic funding project of Anhui Provincial Department of Education for University Top-notch Talents [gxbjZD2021089]
  2. Natural Science Research Foundation of the Department of Education of Anhui Province [KJ2020A0789, KJ2021A1166]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the effects of fermentation factors on the polysaccharides production of Artemisia annua and optimizes the fermentation process. The polysaccharides from fermented Artemisia annua show scavenging effects on free radicals.
In order to investigate the fermentation process of Artemisia polysaccharides, this paper showcases an investigation into the effects of fermentation time, fermentation temperature, strain inoculum, Artemisia annua addition, and shaker speed on the polysaccharides production of Artemisia annua. The yield of Artemisia polysaccharides content was determined based on the optimization of single-factor test, and then a response surface test was conducted with temperature, inoculum, and time as response variables and the yield of Artemisia polysaccharides as response values. The fermentation process was then optimized and the antioxidant activity of Artemisia polysaccharides was monitored using DPPH, ABTS(+), OH, and total reducing power. The optimum fermentation process was determined by the test to be 5% inoculum of Aspergillus niger, temperature 36?, time 2 d, shaker speed 180 r/min, and 4% addition of Artemisia annua, and the extraction of Artemisia polysaccharides was up to 17.04% by this condition of fermentation. The polysaccharides from Artemisia annua fermented by Aspergillus Niger had scavenging effects on DPPH, ABTS, and OH free radicals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据