4.6 Article

Learning Free Gait Transition for Quadruped Robots Via Phase-Guided Controller

期刊

IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 1230-1237

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2021.3136645

关键词

Reinforcement learning; legged robots; machine learning for robot control

类别

资金

  1. Zhejiang Lab [2019KE0AD01]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang University
  3. Institute of flexible electronic technology of Tsinghua [2019KE0AD01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a novel framework for training a quadruped robot to perform various gaits. The robot is able to locomote according to the generated gaits and make transitions among them through the use of independent phases. Additionally, the control policy allows the robot to smoothly execute learned motor skills in natural environments.
Gaits and transitions are key components in legged locomotion. For legged robots, describing and reproducing gaits as well as transitions remain longstanding challenges. Reinforcement learning has become a powerful tool to formulate controllers for legged robots. Learning multiple gaits and transitions, nevertheless, is related to the multi-task learning problems. In this work, we present a novel framework for training a simple control policy for a quadruped robot to locomote in various gaits. Four independent phases are used as the interface between the gait generator and the control policy, which characterizes the movement of four feet. Guided by the phases, the quadruped robot is able to locomote according to the generated gaits, such as walk, trot, pacing and bounding, and to make transitions among those gaits. More general phases can be used to generate complex gaits, such as mixed rhythmic dancing. With the control policy, the Black Panther robot, a medium-dog-sized quadruped robot, can perform all learned motor skills while following the velocity commands smoothly and robustly in natural environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据