4.6 Article

Hovering Locomotion for UAVs With Thrust-Vectoring Control Surfaces

期刊

IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 5214-5221

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2022.3153988

关键词

Aerial systems; mechanics and control; motion control; field robotics

类别

资金

  1. Corn Growers Association of MN
  2. Minnesota Robotics Institute (MnRI), Honeywell
  3. National Science Foundation [CNS-1439728, CNS-1544887, CNS-1531330, CNS-1939033]
  4. USDA/NIFA [2020-67021-30755]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a working prototype of a quad-rotor with control surfaces positioned in the propulsive slipstreams, which can redirect the airflow and produce lateral forces. This unique locomotion approach has various useful applications in aerial sensing.
This letter presents a working prototype of a quad-rotor with control surfaces positioned in the propulsive slipstreams. The control surfaces provide a unique potential to redirect the air flow from the propulsion systems and produce lateral forces at a level attitude. This approach to locomotion has many useful applications in different areas of aerial sensing. Furthermore, the mechanical approach of using control surfaces for this purpose is unique, to the best of the authors' knowledge; until this point, most aerial robot designs that have this locomotion capability make exclusive use of motors and propellers to exert lateral forces. The use of control surfaces in a propeller slipstream poses a potentially useful actuation mode for aerial vehicle designs that have control surfaces. The letter investigates lateral forces from redirected slipstreams as part of a larger development of the Multi-Section (MIST) Unmanned Aerial Vehicle at the University of Minnesota. The paper connects theoretical models with experiments on a testbed and a working prototype that demonstrate feasibility and characterize the force-production capability of slipstream-washed control surfaces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据