4.6 Article

Adaptive and Risk-Aware Target Tracking for Robot Teams With Heterogeneous Sensors

期刊

IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 5615-5622

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2022.3155805

关键词

Multi-robot systems; robotics in hazardous fields; robust/adaptive control

类别

资金

  1. Army Research Lab through ARL DCIST CRA [W911NF17-2-0181]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores a scenario where a team of robots tracks targets or hazards while considering the possibility of sensory failures. The proposed control framework balances the competing objectives of tracking quality maximization and sensor preservation, incorporating risk-aware and adaptive components. By explicitly considering the heterogeneous sensing capabilities of the robots, a more effective risk vs. tracking quality trade-off is achieved.
We consider a scenario where a team of robots with heterogeneous sensors must track a set of targets or hazards which may induce sensory failures on the robots. In particular, the likelihood of failures depends on the proximity between the targets and the robots. We propose a control framework that explicitly addresses the competing objectives of tracking quality maximization and sensor preservation (which impacts the future quality of the generated target estimates). Our framework consists of a risk-aware component-which accounts for the risk of suffering sensor failures, and an adaptive component-which balances the aforementioned competing objectives while accounting for failures that have already occurred. Based on a measure of the observability of the tracking process, our framework can generate aggressive as well as safer robot configurations to track the targets. Crucially, the heterogeneous sensing capabilities of the robots are explicitly considered at each step, allowing for a more expressive risk vs. tracking quality trade-off. Real robot experiments with induced sensor failures demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据