4.6 Article

Adult Skeletal Age-at-Death Estimation through Deep Random Neural Networks: A New Method and Its Computational Analysis

期刊

BIOLOGY-BASEL
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biology11040532

关键词

forensic anthropology; age-at-death estimation; machine learning; neural networks

类别

资金

  1. FundacAo para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/99676/2014]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/99676/2014] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a new method based on multifactorial macroscopic analysis and deep random neural network models to estimate the age of skeletal remains in adults. The results demonstrate that age estimation can be accurately inferred across the entire adult age span, with informative estimates and prediction intervals obtained for the elderly population.
Age-at-death assessment is a crucial step in the identification process of skeletal human remains. Nonetheless, in adult individuals this task is particularly difficult to achieve with reasonable accuracy due to high variability in the senescence processes. To improve the accuracy of age-at-estimation, in this work we propose a new method based on a multifactorial macroscopic analysis and deep random neural network models. A sample of 500 identified skeletons was used to establish a reference dataset (age-at-death: 19-101 years old, 250 males and 250 females). A total of 64 skeletal traits are covered in the proposed macroscopic technique. Age-at-death estimation is tackled from a function approximation perspective and a regression approach is used to infer both point and prediction interval estimates. Based on cross-validation and computational experiments, our results demonstrate that age estimation from skeletal remains can be accurately (similar to 6 years mean absolute error) inferred across the entire adult age span and informative estimates and prediction intervals can be obtained for the elderly population. A novel software tool, DRNNAGE, was made available to the community.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据