4.6 Article

Computational Approach for Probing Redox Potential for Iron-Sulfur Clusters in Photosystem I

期刊

BIOLOGY-BASEL
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biology11030362

关键词

photosystem I; iron-sulfur cluster; continuum electrostatics; broken symmetry DFT; electron transfer; MCCE

类别

资金

  1. DOE Grant [DESC0001423]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photosystem I is a light-driven electron transfer device consisting of three iron-sulfur clusters F-X, F-A, and F-B. Experimental and computational studies have shown that F-X has a lower oxidation potential compared to F-A and F-B, which can be attributed to strong pairwise electrostatic interactions with surrounding residues.
Photosystem I is a light-driven electron transfer device. Available X-ray crystal structure from Thermosynechococcus elongatus showed that electron transfer pathways consist of two nearly symmetric branches of cofactors converging at the first iron-sulfur cluster F-X, which is followed by two terminal iron-sulfur clusters F-A and F-B. Experiments have shown that F-X has lower oxidation potential than F-A and F-B, which facilitates the electron transfer reaction. Here, we use density functional theory and Multi-Conformer Continuum Electrostatics to explain the differences in the midpoint E m potentials of the F-X, F-A and F-B clusters. Our calculations show that F-X has the lowest oxidation potential compared to F-A and F-B due to strong pairwise electrostatic interactions with surrounding residues. These interactions are shown to be dominated by the bridging sulfurs and cysteine ligands, which may be attributed to the shorter average bond distances between the oxidized Fe ion and ligating sulfurs for Fx compared to F-A and F-B. Moreover, the electrostatic repulsion between the 4Fe-4S clusters and the positive potential of the backbone atoms is lowest for F-X compared to both F-A and F-B. These results agree with the experimental measurements from the redox titrations of low-temperature EPR signals and of room temperature recombination kinetics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据