4.6 Review

Repostioning of Telemedicine in Cardiovascular World Post-COVID-19 Pandemic

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.910802

关键词

telemedicine; cardiovascular disease; COVID-19; advantages; challenges

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine has emerged as a rapidly expanding service solution that provides efficient, cost-effective, and time-saving healthcare. Remote monitoring, virtual consultations, and other high-end technologies have revolutionized the traditional forms of care delivery and helped manage cardiovascular disease risk factors.
BackgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine is a quickest expanding service solution to provide improved access to sophisticated healthcare that is efficient, cost-effective, and time-consuming. MethodsThis analysis is evaluated on the basis of several studies that look at the history, benefits, various techniques, challenges, uses, and impact of telemedicine in the treatment of heart failure and cardiac rehabilitation as during COVID-19 outbreak. ResultsPatients avoided or refused medical treatment during COVID-19 pandemic despite the risk of illness and the threat of infections spreading. Telemedicine has become a non-traditional form of care delivery due to better access and high-end technologies such as virtual consultations, face-to-face video, smartphone visits, two-way text communication, distant patient history, and distal characteristic assessment. Remote monitoring can help manage cardiovascular disease risk factors and increase patient participation in blood pressure, heart failure data, and workout or other activity progress. ConclusionBased on the findings of past studies, we can infer that telemedicine is still an emerging subject in the treatment and management of cardiovascular disease. Telemedicine and similar technologies will also revolutionize healthcare services by expanding their reach and providing a big pool of database for better research and analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据