4.7 Article

Artificial intelligence-assisted cryoEM structure of Bfr2-Lcp5 complex observed in the yeast small subunit processome

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-03500-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01 GM124622, S10 RR025080, U24 GM116788, S10 RR024564]
  2. Florida State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AlphaFold-assisted CryoEM structure determination reveals the structure of the Bfr2-Lcp5 complex in the yeast 90S pre-ribosome. The complex interacts similarly to exosome factors Rrp6-Rrp47 and plays a role in regulating 90S transitions.
Eukaryotic ribosome is maturated through an elaborate process that includes modification, processing and folding of pre-ribosomal RNA (pre-rRNAs) by a series of ribosome assembly intermediates. More than 70 factors participate in the dynamic assembly and disassembly of the small subunit processome (90S) inside nucleolus, leading to the early maturation of small subunit. The 5' domain of the 18S rRNA is the last to be incorporated into the stable 90S prior to the cleavage of pre-rRNA at the A1 site. This step is facilitated by the Kre33-Enp2-Bfr2-Lcp5 protein module with the participation of the DEAD-box protein Dbp4. Though structures of Kre33 and Enp2 have been modeled in previously observed 90S structures, that of Bfr2-Lcp5 complex remains unavailable. Here, we report an AlphaFold-assisted structure determination of the Bfr2-Lcp5 complex captured in a 3.99 angstrom - 7.24 angstrom cryoEM structure of 90S isolated from yeast cells depleted of Pih1, a chaperone protein of the 90S core assembly. The structure model is consistent with the protein-protein interaction results and the secondary structures of recombinant Bfr2 and Bfr2-Lcp5 complex obtained by Circular Dichroism. The Bfr2-Lcp5 complex interaction mimics that of exosome factors Rrp6-Rrp47 and acts to regulate 90S transitions. AlphaFold-assisted CryoEM structure determination reveals the Bfr2-Lcp5 complex structure in the yeast 90S pre-ribosome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据